Coppola wines has introduced a series of wines whose labels and names come from several of Coppola’s signature films. Here’s the picture that was included in a promotoinal email I received today from BevMo.
Three of Coppola’s biggest hits, Jaws, King Kong, and Wizard of Oz, are now a Chardonnay, a Cabernet Sauvignon, and a Merlot, with prices that range from $18 to $20. These days, that’s not much more than the price of a movie ticket.
Clearly, the psychology of having ahit in one milieu is now spilling over into a completely different milieu. Given the recent penchant to give wines names like “Arrogant Bastard” and “Bitch,” I guess it’s nos surprise to see another naming convention enter the fray. Thankfully, at least this one is less profane.
Is anyone else out there as angry with Mashable as I now am, thanks to their ultra-intrusive online video ads? As soon as I click on an email link, I start hearing a commercial that’s playing on the Mashable site. Often, I cannot even easily find the commercial that’s playing so I can pause or stop it.
As a media psychologist I have trouble understanding what Mashable thinks it is gaining by alienating its viewership for the sake of paid ads no one wants to view or hear. Their paying customers, sooner or later, are going to abandon Mashable once they find out that their intended audience is being turned off by this particular application of advertising technology. As P&G’s A.G. Lafley has said, “The customer is in charge.”
So, Mashable, why are you trying to stop customer control? Mashable needs to think more about what engagement means and how it works. Consultation services are available….
I subscribe to all kinds of news feeds, from Breitbart and National Review on the right, to NY Times and Washington Post on the left, as well as advertising and psychology feeds. Here is my recommendation to help understand what happened Tuesday, from Advertising Age: http://adage.com/article/campaign-trail/trump-camp-capitalized-early-voting-data/306690/?utm_source=daily_email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=adage&ttl=1479354904?utm_visit=181161
Today’s Washington Post has a nice article about the kinds of appearance factors that make something appear “cute” to us. Here’s the link:
From a media psychology point of view, we are all apparently hard-wired to interpret certain visual cues in ways that excite our dopamine receptors and caring instincts. I would say the article does a good job of illustrating this.
Have you seen the latest commercial for Lexus? It’s called “What Makes Us, Us” and shows us the smarmiest, most arrogant and narcissistic (he can’t help it…he’s just written that way) Lexus driver ever, telling us, “By the time other people start doing what we’ve been doing, we’ve moved on.”
Here it is: https://www.ispot.tv/ad/79go/lexus-what-makes-us-us-featuring-henry-simmons
If what a number of sociologists have been saying about the Millennials is true, that they are the most narcissistic generation in memory, and if it’s also true that effective advertising arouses positive feelings of affiliation in viewers, then Lexus should be seeing land office business from the M-folks soon.
Or maybe they just need a different creative approach.
It’s that awkward time of year when the traditional TV season is over and new shows are just now launching. Just thinking about what’s on TV these days and what used to be on TV….
I remember watching “Ozzie and Harriett,” a sit-com with a musical twist as Ricky the kid Nelson grew into Rick Nelson, teen idol. Now I have “Empire” to consider, a raw drama of a family and its recording empire coming apart at the seams, then (perhaps) sewing itself back together???????
I remember “Father Knows Best” (dating myself, I know) and “The Honeymooners” (my dad’s favorite show, along with “Archie Bunker”); “The Brady Bunch” and “I Love Lucy”; “Bonanza” and “Sea Hunt.”
Now there’s “Two Broke Girls,” “Shameless,” “The Good Wife,” and “Vinyl.”
On the other hand, where once there was “High Chaparral,” now there’s “Hell on Wheels.” And “Dragnet” has become “The Sopranos” or, perhaps, “NCIS.”
And we never had anything to compare with either “Downton Abbey” or “Game of Thrones.” Nor “Justified,” whose like we are not likely to see again any time soon, now that author Elmore Leonard has passed.
But where is today’s “Murphy Brown”?
The Golden Age of Television, some say. I wonder.
Recently Medscape cited a recent study about the MAOA gene and its being linked to a greater risk for antisocial behavior for young men who “who were exposed to violence or maltreatment in childhood….”
I bring this up in my blog because as many of you know, I have often commented negatively on studies that purport to show that engagement with violent media, including violent video games, can lead to violent behavior in the real world. My objections have been based on Bandura’s Social Cognitive Learning Theory and the person as agent therein.
The Medscape piece can be accessed at:
Quoting from the piece:
“Investigators found higher levels of conduct disorder in adolescence and of antisocial behavior in adulthood, including a higher probability of arrest and partner violence, among those who had been exposed to violence in childhood, such as parental maltreatment and sexual and physical abuse.
“Importantly, those with the MAOA polymorphism were more likely to engage in antisocial behaviors compared with those who had been maltreated as children but who did not carry the polymorphism.”
I believe this accounts in part for why some perpetrators of mass killings and the like act out their behaviors and others do not.
Also, I want to point out that researchers Reeves and Nass, in their landmark studies that showed how adults respond to mediated images and presentations as if they were real events taking place in real time, leads to my hypothesizing that such youthful exposure need not have been a real event for the person. It could as well have been viewing someone else being treated in this way AND even viewing violent media. But to have that effect, the “victim” would be most impacted if they had low self-efficacy AND the MAOA gene.
What do you think?